Ding Dong the Pervert is DEAD
UPDATE: January 17, 2014. ‘Lord’ Alistair McAlpine, Margaret Thatcher’s darling and treasurer, who liked young boys to suck his penis, and owned a collection of porno paintings by jailed paedophile Graham Ovenden.
UPDATE: McAlpine News May 24, 2013: He has nailed Sally Bercow on a libel suit. One of his mates, a judge in the High Court, found her guilty of libel in a classic free speech issue. However, McAlpine IS a paedophile, he once owned child pornography and that makes him a stinking kiddy fiddler!
UPDATE May 17, 2013. Lord McAlpine is suing the Speaker’s wife Sally Bercow over a tweet sent when McAlpine was recently exposed as a paedophile by a victim who later withdrew the allegation. The BBC’s Newsnight ran a program on prominent paedophiles but never named Lord Alistair McAlpine. He was, however, named on the Internet and in particular on Twitter. Ms Bercow simply tweeted a question “Why is Lord McAlpine trending? *Innocent face*”, now greedy paedo McAlpine is attempting to extort even more compensation from Ms Bercow in addition to the £310,000 he has already got from the BBC and ITV who, actually never mentioned his name. More info here: The Guardian
McAlpine is a DEAD Paedophile
If a bloke in a council house owned a collection of photos of naked prepubescent girls he would be arrested as a paedophile, dragged before the courts, found guilty, fined or imprisoned and put on the Sex Offenders Register. The stash would be confiscated and, hopefully destroyed.
But what happens when Lord McAlpine owns a “collection of erotic art” priced in the thousands of pounds? Did you notice the magic phrase, art collection? So because some rich paedophile owns a collection of photographs or pseudo photographs it is now art.
Pseudo photographs are paintings that look like a real photographs, but have been painted while the subject poses or from photographs of the subject, who has previously posed. It changes nothing, kiddie porn is kiddie porn.
How the rich get away with it
Graham Ovenden is a painter and photographer who specialises in images of young girls. The UK police have made several attempts to prosecute him, but all have failed due to an outcry from Establishment figures who obviously believe that rich bastards are art collectors, but the lower classes are perverts. Anyone possessing images of children in erotic poses is a paedophile and should be locked up for at least 30-years, rich or poor.
Graham Ovenden was summoned to court on April 9, 2010. It resulted thus: “On October 22, 2009, after less than two days of trial, the jury was discharged and a new trial date set. On April 9, 2010, after a five-minute hearing the case was thrown out by the judge as two key prosecution witnesses, police officers who had searched his home three and a half years earlier, failed to appear in court. The police declined to comment and the CPS refused to disclose how much the investigation had cost the taxpayer. Graham Ovenden described the police as “totally and utterly transfixed by childhood sexuality” and himself as “a controversial figure and, at the moment, a very angry old man”. The prosecution declined to launch an appeal” (Text in italics from Wikipedia) I smell a cover up.
There is enough evidence to prosecute McAlpine
When Jimmy Savile was finally exposed as a paedophile, Lord McAlpine’s name came up as being one of the predators in a Tory Paedo ring who abused boys and girls in children’s homes. He cried foul and made a very public denial. The BBC, who never actually named him, paid him £185,000 compensation. Why? And why did they also cancel an exposé of the dead Savile a month before they celebrated his life in a Christmas special?
Because they are part of the Establishment and Jimmy Savile, despite the rumours and police investigations performed his stupid clown act on the BBC for 50-years. People, BBC people and others, knew what he was; but did nothing.
Lord McApine who admits to owning some Ovenden ‘Art’, was exposed by the now defunct Scallywag magazine in the early 1990s. But he never sued the magazine! David Icke in his book ‘The Biggest Secret’ named McAlpine as a paedophile. McAlpine never sued him either. So why is McAlpine so worried now?
Here’s why, the Savile revelations have opened a can of worms that will, and is, exposing paedophiles in high places. Those paedophiles are in government, the Civil Service, the Church, the Entertainment industry and the Judiciary. They are all running scared, including McAlpine.
LATEST! McAlpine and his mates in high places tramples over free speech
Do people know about McAlpine as well? But, like they did with Savile, are choosing to do nothing? I believe there is enough evidence to charge and convict on ownership of the Ovenden ‘Art’ Collection alone and a proper investigation could bring this dying pervert to book, possibly on other even more serious charges as well. Will the cops investigate? Don’t hold your breath.
McAlpine admits he owned the Ovenden ‘art’ collection
Graham Ovenden Wikipedia entry
The BBC’s capitulation The video you’ll see is not the one originally published, so why have the BBC removed the original video I wonder?
Twitter hash tags:
@TheDuckShoot #InvestigateMcAlpine #PaedoBritain #McAlpine